切換菜單
切換偏好設定選單
切換個人選單
尚未登入
若您做出任何編輯,會公開您的 IP 位址。

香港鐵路百科目前正在初步建設階段。如你對香港鐵路現況、歷史及發展有興趣,且自認為具備資料採集及內容編寫的技巧,現誠邀加入我們一同建設內容,改善香港鐵路圈的資訊鴻溝及質素!

於 2024年12月22日 (日) 15:29 由 Bakasei1900對話 | 貢獻 所做的修訂 (建立內容為「圖4 顯示了過去13年中七種表定公共交通服務每年運送的乘客量。自 1954 年以來,每年增幅在 5.8% 至 12.5% 之間。雖然最大增幅出現在 1960 年代初期,但過去四年的成長率一直穩定在每年 6% 左右。」的頁面)

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Chapter 2/zh
第一章-引論 現存公共交通 第三章-公共交通種類

現有公共交通

  1. 香港的公共交通服務由巴士、電車、乘客渡輪、郊區火車和的士提供。 剩下的幾輛人力車不再在交通系統中發揮重要作用。
  2. 表定公共交通服務由七個獨立的企業提供,除政府擁有的鐵路外,所有企業都是私營企業。其中三個運輸機構在香港島營運,兩個在內陸(九龍及新界)營運,另外兩個在兩者之間提供渡輪服務。各營運商提供的客運總量比例如表2所示。
PUBLIC TRANSPORT PASSENGERS — 1966
TABLE 2
AREA AND UNDERTAKING TYPE OF
SERVICE
PASSENGERS CARRIED
Number Per Cent
of Total
Hong Kong Island:
Hong Kong Tramways Co., Ltd. Tram 181,589,000 14.7
China Motor Bus Co., Ltd. Bus 186,561,000 15.0
Peak Tramways Co., Ltd. Cable tram 2,174,000 0.2
370,324,000 29.9
Mainland:
Kowloon Motor Bus Co., Ltd. Bus 643,120,000 51.9
Kowloon-Canton Railway Suburban train 8,734,000 0.7
651,854,000 52.6
Harbour and Islands:
Hongkong & Yaumati Ferry Co., Ltd. Ferry 161,074,000 13.0
Kowloon-Canton Railway Ferry 56,332,000 4.5
217,406,000 17.5
TOTAL 1,239,584,000 100.0
SOURCE: Preliminary World Highway Statistics—1965, International Road Federation.
  1. 儘管近年來私家車數量迅速增加,但公共交通仍然是個人出行的主要方式。每天超過 330 萬人次的公共交通出行就證明了其重要性。與世界許多其他地區的趨勢相反,香港的公共交通乘客量不單逐年持續增長,而且增長速度遠高於人口增長速度。 隨着人口的增長和商業活動帶來更多的流動以及生活水平的持續提高,預計未來私家車註冊量可能會大幅增加。然而,公共交通因其本身的高效率運送大量人員的能力,在可預見的未來將繼續成為主要的出行方式。

公共交通服務區域

  1. 目前,91%的公共交通行程是在佔29平方英里的香港和九龍市區內,以及兩地之間的渡輪進行。另外 9% 是在剩餘 369 平方英里的土地上進行的,其中包括離島。圖表3顯示了1966年公共交通乘坐情況的地區分佈情況。
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC
TRANSPORT PASSENGERS
TABLE 3
AREA PASSENGERS LAND AREA
Number Per Cent
of Total
Square
Miles
Per Cent
of Total
Urban area:
Hong Kong Island 348,870,000 28.1 13.4 3.4
Kowloon 568,817,000 45.9 15.6 3.9
Between Island and Kowloon 210,239,000 17.0
Subtotal 1,127,926,000 91.0 29.0 7.3
Suburban Areas:
Hong Kong Island 21,454,000 1.7 15.8 4.0
New Territories 83,037,000[a] 6.7 353.3 88.7
Outlying ferry services 7,167,000[b] 0.6
Subtotal 111,658,000 9.0 369.1 92.7
TOTAL 1,239,584,000 100.0 398.1 100.0
  1. Excludes passengers carried by New Territories taxicabs and dual-purpose vehicles operating as buses, and small bus operation on Lantau Island.
  2. Excludes minor ferry services.
  1. 路綫覆蓋範圍——市區所有建成區都在一條或多條公共交通路綫的四分之一英里範圍內。大多數地區都有不止一條路綫提供服務,並且在許多不同的總站/碼頭/車站組合之間提供直接服務。儘管路綫存在重疊和重複,但人口密度高、交通量大、移動模式複雜,保證了這種不尋常的服務。圖4顯示了市區及近郊社區現有的公共交通路綫。
  2. 近郊區域和農村社區也有良好的公共交通覆蓋。在這些地區裏,幾乎每條主要道路都有一條或多條公交線路提供服務。近郊內以及往返市區中心的本地服務非常廣泛。有直達近郊和鄉村點的渡輪服務,也有鐵路提供通勤服務從一些邊陲社區直接通往九龍市中心。在新界,亦有許多小型車輛通常按固定路綫和時間表營運,與巴士和鐵路服務競爭。
  3. 過海出行——兩岸發展互相倚賴,對往來兩岸的旅程產生大量需求,以及將水上運輸連接每段如此旅程成為必需。這對公共交通服務的發展、路綫格局和成本產生了重大影響。 圖5反映了過海交通的重要性,該圖顯示了為滿足這一出行需求而開發的渡輪路綫的日常使用情況。
  4. 每四個渡輪乘客中只有一人無使用其他交通模式完成行程,多數人必須使用其他交通服務接駁行程。市區及近郊巴士路綫均有遷就渡輪航線,大多數渡輪碼頭均設有主要巴士總站。九廣鐵路的客用車站置於一主要渡輪碼頭旁,而香港島的電車綫與碼頭也只有兩三個路口的距離。然而,乘坐渡輪所需的步行距離仍相當長;儘管大多數路綫上的班次頻繁,但使用渡輪仍顯著增加行程時長。
圖四 — 現有公共交通路綫
圖五 — 過海行程(1965年)

公共交通使用趨勢

PUBLIC TRANSPORT PASSENGERS IN RELATION
TO POPULATION 1954-1966
TABLE 4
YEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORT PASSENGERS ANNUAL
RIDES
PER CAPITA
Number Per Cent
Increase
1954 516,460,000 227
1955 553,063,000 7.1 236
1956 594,201,000 7.4 244
1957 640,597,000 8.0 248
1958 683,135,000 6.6 249
1959 723,156,000 5.8 253
1960 813,471,000 12.5 273
1961 892,540,000 9.7 285
1962 975,745,000 9.3 301
1963 1,034,686,000 6.0 308
1964 1,095,547,000 5.9 316
1965 1,164,695,000 6.3 325
1966 1,239,584,000 6.4 335
  1. 圖4 顯示了過去13年中七種表定公共交通服務每年運送的乘客量。自 1954 年以來,每年增幅在 5.8% 至 12.5% 之間。雖然最大增幅出現在 1960 年代初期,但過去四年的成長率一直穩定在每年 6% 左右。
  2. 1966年,公共交通乘客量是1954年的近2.5倍;然而,人口只增加了1.5倍。在此期間,人均每年乘坐公共交通的次數從227次增加到335次。因此,公共交通乘客量不僅反映了人口的增加,而且反映了每人乘坐次數的增加。
PUBLIC TRANSPORT PASSENGERS BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA
TABLE 5
AREA 1954 1966 PER CENT
INCREASE
(1954-1966)
Number Per Cent Number Per Cent
Hong Kong Island 199,453,000 38.6 370,324,000 29.9 86
Mainland 206,610,000 40.0 651,854,000 52.6 215
Harbour and Islands 110,397,000 21.4 217,406,000 17.5 97
TOTAL 516,460,000 100.0 1,239,584,000 100.0 140


URBAN AND SUBURBAN DISTRIBUTION OF
PUBLIC TRANSPORT RIDING
TABLE 6
AREA 1954 1966 PER CENT
INCREASE
(1954-1966)
Number Per Cent Number Per Cent
Urban 491,134,000 95.1 1,127,926,000 91.0 130
Suburban[a] 25,326,000 4.9 111,658,000 9.0 341
TOTAL 516,460,000 100.0 1,239,584,000 100.0 140
  1. Includes trips between urban and suburban areas.
Figure 6 — Annual Public Transport Passengers by Undertakings


PUBLIC TRANSPORT PASSENGERS BY UNDERTAKINGS
TABLE 7
UNDERTAKING 1954 1966 PER CENT
INCREASE
(1954-1966)
Number Per Cent Number Per Cent
Kowloon Motor Bus Co., Ltd. 203,246,000 39.4 643,120,000 51.9 216
China Motor Bus Co., Ltd. 55,950,000 10.8 186,561,000 15.0 233
Hong Kong Tramways Co., Ltd. 141,613,000 27.4 181,589,000 14.7 28
Hongkong & Yaumati Ferry Co., Ltd. 75,897,000 14.7 161,074,000 13.0 112
Star Ferry Co., Ltd. 34,500,000 6.7 56,332,000 4.5 63
Kowloon-Canton Railway 3,364,000 0.7 8,733,000 0.7 160
Peak Tramways Co., Ltd. 1,890,000 0.3 2,174,000 0.2 15
TOTAL 516,460,000 100.0 1,239,584,000 100.0 140


ANNUAL PER CAPITA EXPENDITURE
ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT
TABLE 8
YEAR TOTAL PUBLIC
TRANSPORT
EXPENDITURE[a]
EXPENDITURE
PER
CAPITA
1961 $124,874,000 $41.89
1962 $135,025,000 $43.09
1963 $150,718,000 $46.43
1964 $166,304,000 $49.51
1965 $175,900,000 $50.67
  1. Total annual passenger fares paid to the seven scheduled public transport undertakings.


FARES


AVERAGE FARES
TABLE 9
YEAR[a] AVERAGE FARE PER PASSENGER (CENTS)[b]
Bus, Tram and
Train
Ferry All Services
1961 15.0 16.1 15.2
1962 14.7 16.1 14.9
1963 15.2 16.2 15.4
1964 15.9 16.1 15.9
1961 16.0 16.2 16.0
  1. As the transport companies have different financial years, these figures relate to the financial year ending in the year indicated.
  2. Passenger revenue divided by total number of passengers carried.
Trams 20 cents first class, 10 cents "second" class, for distances up to 6.6 miles.
Buses, urban areas 10 cents for the first fare section of approximately one mile, 20 cents for more than one section up to 7.5 miles on Kowloon routes; 10, 20, 25 and 30 cent first section fares on the Island, with 10 cent section increments.
Buses, to suburban areas 30 cents to $1.10, depending on distance travelled; 10 to 30 cents for short trips within suburban areas.
Suburban trains 40 cents to $3.00 first class, 30 cents to $2.25 second class, and 20 cents to $1.50 third class, depending on distance travelled; maximum distance 22 miles.
Peak tram 40 to 60 cents depending on distance travelled; full distance 0.8 miles.
Ferries, between urban areas 20 or 25 cents first class, 10 cents "second" class; maximum distance one to 2.5 miles.
Ferries, to suburban areas 50 cents to $1.20 first class, 40 cents to $1.00 "second" class, depending on distance travelled.
MODE 1ST CLASS 2ND CLASS
Tram 20 cents 10 cents
Ferry 25 cents 10 cents
Bus 10 cents 10 cents
TOTAL 55 cents 30 cents

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 10

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 11

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 12

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 13

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 14

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 15

CHARACTERISTICS OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT TRAVEL

File:MTS Fig7.png
Figure 7 — Hourly Variation of Public Transport Travel—1965
File:MTS Fig8.png
Figure 8 — Daily Variation of Public Transport Travel—1965
File:MTS p13 pubtrans.png

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 16


OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 17

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 18

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 19

File:MTS p14 tramstop.png
File:MTS p14 busstop.png
File:MTS Fig9.png
Figure 9 — Tram and Bus Passengers East of Central District

PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 20

FINANCIAL RESULTS

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 21

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 22

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 23

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 24

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 25


NON-SCHEDULED PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 26

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 27

Archive:Hong Kong Mass Transport Study/Table 28